Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: result from COVAD e-survey study.

COVID-19 has been suggested as a possible trigger of disease flares in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, factors associated with disease flares remain unknown. This study aimed to identify factors associated with breakthrough infection (BIs) and disease flares in patients with RA following COVID-19. We analysed data from RA patients who participated in the COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study. Demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, comorbidities, pharmacologic treatment and details regarding disease flares were extracted from the COVAD database. Factors associated with disease flare-ups were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The analysis comprised 1928 patients with RA who participated in the COVAD study. Younger age, Caucasian ethnicity, comorbidities with obstructive chronic pulmonary disease and asthma were associated with COVID-19 breakthrough infection. Moreover, younger age (odds ratio (OR): 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p < 0.001), ethnicity other than Asian, past history of tuberculosis (OR: 3.80, 95% CI 1.12-12.94, p = 0.033), treatment with methotrexate (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.56-4.17, p < 0.001), poor global physical health (OR: 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.15, p = 0.044) and mental health (OR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95, p < 0.001) were independent factors associated disease flares in patients with RA. Our study highlights the impact of socio-demographic factors, clinical characteristics and mental health on disease flares in patients with RA. These insights may help determine relevant strategies to proactively manage RA patients at risk of flares.

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS): a 20-year follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a chronic grade of inflammation. Cardiovascular events represent the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases; however, the significance and prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with pSS remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical significance of cardiovascular disease in pSS and analyze the risk of cardiovascular disease according to glandular/extraglandular involvement and positivity to anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB autoantibodies. METHODS: A retrospective study including patients diagnosed with pSS fulfilling the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria was followed and evaluated in our outpatient clinic between 2000 and 2022. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors with pSS was evaluated, and a possible association with clinical and immunological characteristics, the treatments received, and the impact on cardiovascular disease were determined. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed in an attempt to determine potential risk factors associated with cardiovascular involvement. RESULTS: A total of 102 pSS patients were included. Eighty-two percent were female, with a mean age of 65±24 years and a disease duration of 12.5 ±6 years. Thirty-six patients (36%) had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Arterial hypertension was diagnosed in 60 (59%) patients, dyslipidemia in 28 (27%), diabetes in 15 (15%), obesity in 22 (22%), and hyperuricemia in 19 (18%). History of arrhythmia was found in 25 (25%), conduction defects in 10 (10%), arterial peripheral vascular disease in 7 (7%), venous thrombosis in 10 (10%), coronary artery disease in 24 (24%), and cerebrovascular disease in 22 (22%) of patients. Patients with extraglandular involvement had a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (p=0.04), dyslipidemia (p=0.003), LDL mean values (p=0.038), hyperuricemia (p=0.03), and coronary artery disease (p=0.01) after adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, and the significant variables in the univariate analysis. Patients with Ro/SSA and La/SSB autoantibodies had a substantially higher risk of hyperuricemia (p=0.01), arrhythmia (p=0.01), coronary artery disease (p=0.02), cerebrovascular disease (p=0.02), and venous thrombosis (p =0.03). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher odds of cardiovascular risk factors were associated with extraglandular involvement (p=0.02), treatment with corticosteroids (p=0.02), ESSDAI>13 (p=0.02), inflammatory markers including ESR levels (p 0.007), and serologic markers such as low C3 levels (p=0.03) and hypergammaglobulinemia (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Extraglandular involvement was associated with a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, and coronary artery disease. Anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB seropositivity was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiac rhythm abnormalities, hyperuricemia, venous thrombosis, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Raised inflammatory markers, disease activity measured by ESSDAI, extraglandular involvement, serologic markers including hypergammaglobulinemia and low C3, and treatment with corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular comorbidities. Key Points • Patients with pSS are vulnerable to cardiovascular risk factors. There is an interconnection between extraglandular involvement, disease activity, inflammatory markers, and cardiovascular risk comorbidities. • Anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB seropositivity was associated with a higher frequency of cardiac conduction abnormalities, coronary artery disease, venous thrombosis, and stroke. • Hypergammaglobulinemia, elevated ESR, and low C3 are associated with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. • Valid risk stratification tools to help with prevention and consensus on the management of CVDs in pSS patients are warranted.

Clinical phenotype in scleroderma patients based on autoantibodies.

Objective: We aimed to characterize the clinical phenotype of patients with SSc based on autoantibodies (topoisomerase antibody (Scl-70), ACA and ANA). Methods: We included patients with SSc who fulfilled the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria, with disease duration ≤15 years. Six groups of patients were defined: ACA-lcSSC, Scl-70-lcSSc, ANA-lcSSc, Scl-70-dcSSc, ANA-dcSSc and ACA-dcSSc patients. We compared the different groups of patients. In the ANA subgroup, we included patients negative for SSc-specific antibodies (Scl-70 and ACA). We assessed the following: risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), myositis, scleroderma renal crisis, cardiac involvement, gastrointestinal involvement, pulmonary hypertension, treatment, cancer and all-cause mortality. Results: One hundred and thirteen SSc patients were included: 72 (64%) females, 82 (73%) lcSSc and 31 (27%) dcSSc. Among patients with lcSSc, 43 (52%) were ACA+, 16 (19%) Scl-70+ and 23 (28%) ANA+, and among patients with dcSSc, 13 (42%) patients were Scl-70+, 11 (35%) ANA+ and 7 (23%) ACA+. Scl-70-lcSSc patients had a significantly shorter time from RP to SSc diagnosis (P = 0.04), higher CRP (P = 0.04), renal scleroderma crisis (P = 0.02), ILD (P = 0.03) and diastolic dysfunction (P = 0.04) than ANA-lcSSc patients. Scl-70-dcSSc patients had a higher rate of myositis (P = 0.04), renal crisis (P = 0.03), CRP elevation (P = 0.002), ILD (P = 0.04), pericardial effusion (P = 0.03) and cancer (P = 0.04) than ANA-dcSSc patients. The risk of ILD was higher in Scl-70 patients during the first 10 years than in ACA+ and ANA+ patients (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). The risk of major organ involvement was higher in Scl-70+ patients, followed by ANA+ and ACA+ patients, throughout 15 years of follow-up. All-cause mortality was higher in dcSSc patients than in lcSSc patients, but no differences were found regarding antibody positivity. Conclusion: We have characterized the clinical phenotype of patients based on autoantibodies: Scl-70 patients show the greatest risk of major organ involvement, followed by ANA+ patients and ACA+ patients. The risk of ILD in Scl-70+ patients suggests that these patients should be monitored closely, irrespective of skin involvement. These results might provide new ways to help with the early diagnosis and management and in assessment of the prognosis of the disease.

Atypical Debut of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis as Acute Tonsilitis and Strawberry Gum: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis characterized by necrosis, granulomatous inflammation, and vasculitis. It is characterized by the triad of the upper and lower respiratory system, lung, and kidney disease. Although it is usually a multisystemic disease, limited forms have also been described, and otolaryngological involvement is the first manifestation in up to 80-95% of the cases. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, we describe the case of an ANCA negative patient with a limited form of GPA that presented a necrotic lesion confined to the right tonsil compatible with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, which later presented positive ANCA antibodies. Oral lesions may be the initial manifestation of GPA, and systemic involvement can be presented within weeks or months. Although the oral manifestations have been well described, the initial presentation with oral lesions is very rare, and presentation with oropharyngeal manifestation is even rarer. This disease is generally characterized by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA); however, there are rare cases with negative ANCA. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis was established based on the clinical presentation and the histopathological findings of the characteristic inflammatory pattern.

Biological agents for rheumatic diseases in the outbreak of COVID-19: friend or foe?

BACKGROUND: The recent outbreak of COVID-19 has raised concerns in the rheumatology community about the management of immunosuppressed patients diagnosed with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. It is not clear whether the use of biological agents may suppose a risk or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, it has been suggested that severe respiratory forms of COVID-19 occur as a result of exacerbated inflammation status and cytokine production. This prompted the use of interleukin 6 (IL-6) (tocilizumab and sarilumab) and IL-1 inhibitors (anakinra) in severe COVID-19 disease and more recently JAK1/2 inhibitor (baricitinib). Therefore, patients with rheumatic diseases provide a great opportunity to learn about the use of biological agents as protective drugs against SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVES: To estimate COVID-19 infection rate in patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RMD), determine the influence of biological agents treatment as risk or protective factors and study the prognosis of patients with rheumatic diseases receiving biological agents compared to the general population in a third-level hospital setting in León, Spain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study including patients seen at our rheumatology department who received bDMARDs for rheumatic diseases between December 1st 2019 and December 1st 2020, and analysed COVID-19 infection rate. All patients who attended our rheumatology outpatient clinic with diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease receiving treatment with biological agents were included. Main variable was the hospital admission related to COVID-19. The covariates were age, sex, comorbidities, biological agent, duration of treatment, mean dose of glucocorticoids and need for intensive care unit . We performed an univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to assess risk factors of COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: There were a total of 4464 patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation. 40 patients out of a total of 820 patients with rheumatic diseases (4.8%) receiving bDMARDs contracted COVID-19 and 4 required hospital care. Crude incidence rate of COVID-19 requiring hospital care among the general population was 3.6%, and it was 0.89% among the group with underlying rheumatic diseases. 90% of patients receiving bDMARDS with COVID-19 did not require hospitalisation. Out of the 4464 patients, 869 patients died, 2 of which received treatment with biological agents. Patients with rheumatic diseases who tested positive for COVID-19 were older (female: median age 60.8 IQR 46-74; male: median age 61.9 IQR 52-70.3) than those who were negative for COVID-19 (female: median age 58.3 IQR 48-69; male: median age 56.2 IQR 47-66), more likely to have hypertension (45% vs 26%, OR 2.25 (CI 1.18-4.27),p 0.02), cardiovascular disease (23 % vs 9.6%, OR 2.73 (1.25-5.95), p 0.02), be smokers (13% vs 4.6%, OR 2.95 (CI 1.09-7.98), p 0.04), receiving treatment with rituximab (20% vs 8%, 2.28 (CI 1.24-6.32), p 0.02) and a higher dose of glucocorticoids (OR 2.5 (1.3-10.33, p 0.02) and were less likely to be receiving treatment with IL-6 inhibitors (2.5% vs 14%, OR 0.16, (CI 0.10-0.97, p 0.03). When exploring the effect of the rest of the therapies between groups (affected patients vs unaffected), we found no significant differences in bDMARD proportions. IL-1 inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors and belimumab-treated patients showed the lowest incidence of COVID-19 among adult patients with rheumatic diseases. We found no differences in sex or rheumatological disease between patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and patients who tested negative. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) does not associate with severe manifestations of COVID-19. Patients with rheumatic disease diagnosed with COVID-19 were more likely to be receiving a higher dose of glucocorticoids and treatment with rituximab. IL-6 inhibitors may have a protective effect.